Treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms

Article information

J Korean Soc Geriatr Neurosurg. 2022;18(2):27-32
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 October 21
doi : https://doi.org/10.51638/jksgn.2022.00031
1Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
2Department of Neurosurgery, Changwon Hanmaeum Hospital, Changwon, Korea
3Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
Corresponding Author: Ja Myoung Lee, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, 11 Samjeongja-ro, Seongsan-gu, Changwon 51472, Korea Tel: +82-55-750-8112; Fax: +82-55-750-8737 E-mail: wkauddl82@naver.com
Received 2022 March 6; Revised 2022 June 10; Accepted 2022 June 22.

Abstract

Objective

In recent years, the number of cases of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in older patients has been increasing, but the best treatment remains a matter of debate. This study aimed to compare the treatment methods for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients aged 65 years and older.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of data from unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with surgical clipping or endovascular coiling between 2004 and 2019. Clinical and imaging information was collected. The treatment methods, procedure-related complications, and imaging and clinical results were analyzed. Data were assessed through a comparative analysis of underlying diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia), smoking and alcohol use history, the location and size of the aneurysms for patients who received each treatment, and complications that occurred after each treatment.

Results

Of 211 patients over the age of 65, 71 were treated with clipping and 140 with coiling. The complications that occurred immediately after treatment included postoperative hemorrhage (subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic subdural hemorrhage, infection, and puncture site infection. Postoperative computed tomography images of the clipping sites had four times more opacity than those of coil embolization, but the outcomes (Glasgow outcome scores) showed no significant differences between clipping and coil embolization.

Conclusion

Coil embolization and clipping are safe and effective treatment methods for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients. Thus, the active treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which are likely to be which are at risk for rupture, should be considered.

Introduction

The elderly population is increasing exponentially every year and many populations experience life expectancies over 80 years. In most developed countries, more than 75% of the population die after the age of 75 [1]. With the development of non-invasive imaging examination methods, the diagnosis rate of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the elderly is increasing [2]. Over the past few decades, the development of microsurgical and intravascular surgical treatment techniques has greatly improved, leading to better outcomes in patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms [3,4]. In addition, the development of neurocritical care and patient monitoring has played an important role in enhancing the safety associated with aggressive treatments [5,6]. Although studies of treatment methods have reported that intravascular coil embolization has significantly lower overall and short-term mortality than direct neck clipping [1], the recurrence rate of cerebral aneurysms is significantly higher [7]. Although intravascular coil embolization is commonly performed in the elderly [2], it is difficult to execute due to the physiological complications, such as vacuum tortuosity and atherosclerosis, which accompany aging. Therefore, the elderly often choose only conservative therapy without invasive treatment [8]. The aging process changes the patient’s physiological condition, resulting in a reduced life expectancy, increased comorbidities, an increased surgical risk due to the invasiveness and extended operating hours, and an increased risk of intravascular coil embolization due to vascular tortuosity and arteriosclerosis [9]. In such situations, neurosurgeons experience conflicts over the choice of the treatment method for unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the elderly. In this study, we aimed to perform a retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging data from elderly patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms, including the treatment methods.

Material and Method

Patients

Data were collected from patients with cerebral aneurysms from 1997 to 2017 at Gyeongsang National University Hospital. A total of 2,850 patients treated for unruptured cerebral aneurysms were enrolled. Patients were included if they were aged 65 years or older, regardless of sex, and had a cerebral aneurysm detected by angiography. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gyeongsang National University Hospital (protocol code: GNUH 2022-02-014 and March 15, 2022).

Method

Of the total 2,850 patients, 211 elderly patients aged 65 years or older were diagnosed with cerebral aneurysm and subjected to coil embolization or clipping. All 211 patients had a follow-up period of less than 6 months. Of these, 3 overlapping patients were excluded from the study, and a total of 208 patients were analyzed. Patients who underwent cerebral direct neck clipping and coil embolism were classified according to the location of the cerebral aneurysm. The treatment strategies were determined through discussions with a neurosurgery specialist and a neurosurgeon who could perform neurological intervention procedures. Patient records were analyzed to assess the results obtained using the 2 different treatment methods.

Clinical outcomes

We used the Glasgow outcome score (GOS) to quantify the clinical results of patients at the time of discharge after clipping or coil embolization. GOS scores of 1 to 3 points suggest a poor prognosis, and GOS scores of 4 to 5 points suggest a good prognosis. Post-surgical complications, including cerebral hemorrhage (intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and puncture site infection, were analyzed. Patients who were followed up after surgery were subjected to angiographic computed tomography after 3 months and magnetic resonance imaging after 6 months, after which outpatient revisits were performed on a yearly basis to clarify the postoperative change or to find out aneurysm recurrence.

Results

After excluding cases of overlapping procedures and insufficient data, a total of 208 patients were analyzed. Of those patients, 69 underwent clipping surgery (47 females, 22 males), about twice the case, and 139 underwent coil embolization (99 females, 40 males). The average age of patients undergoing clipping and coil embolization was 68.29 and 71.46 years, respectively (Table 1). The average size of the cerebral aneurysm subjected to clipping and coil embolization was 7.4 mm and 7.09 mm, respectively (Table 1). There were 15 patients with complications after clipping, of which 7 (9.9%), 2 (2.8%), and 6 (8.5%) developed post-surgical hemorrhage, chronic subdural hematoma, and cerebral infarction, respectively. Three of the 6 patients who developed cerebral infarction after clipping were discharged from the hospital because of improved symptoms. Five patients developed complications after the coil embolization surgery. Among them, post-surgical brain hemorrhage occurred in 2 (1.4%) patients, and puncture site infection occurred in one (0.7%) patients. Of the 2 patients with cerebral infarction following embolization surgery, one improved and was discharged (Table 2).

Basic information of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Complications after treatment with clipping and coil embolization

Two cerebral infarctions occurred at the anterior communicating artery, 2 cases occurred at the middle cerebral artery (MCA) after clipping, and 2 cases occurred at the anterior cerebral artery 2/3 junction during coil embolization. The total number of complications was 3 times higher after clipping than after coil embolization, which was a significant result (Table 2). However, the difference between the GOS of the 2 treatment groups was not significant at the time of discharge. After clipping surgery, 53 patients were discharged with a GOS of 5 points; 8 patients were discharged with a GOS of ≤4 points, 2 of whom recovered to a GOS of 5 points. After coil embolization surgery, 131 of 140 patients were discharged with a GOS of 5 points and 8 with ≤4 GOS points, 2 of whom recovered to a GOS of 5 points (Table 2).

There were 3 recurrences at the unruptured cerebral aneurysm clipping and coil embolization sites: 2 cases after clipping and one after coil embolization. MCA clipping was performed in both recurrences after clipping; additional coiling was performed in the area where recurrence occurred after coil embolization. In coil embolization, recurrence occurred in the remaining neck area of the unruptured cerebral aneurysm in the basilar artery bifurcation; even in secondary embolization, not all saccular aneurysms were blocked, and outpatient progress was observed.

There were 5 cases in which clipping was performed on unruptured cerebral aneurysms that remained after the onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Of the 5 cases, 3 MCA, 1 anterior communicating artery (AcomA), and 1 anterior choroidal artery were treated. The 13 cases in which coil embolization was performed were more diversely located than those in clipping: 4 posterior communicating artery, 2 AcomA, 2 superior cerebellar artery, 1 MCA, 1 internal carotid artery, 1 posterior inferior cerebellar artery, 1 paraclinoid artery, and 1 distributed at the anterior cerebral artery 2/3 junction.

Discussion

For the elderly, the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms has been controversial. Many studies have been published regarding the management of unruptured cerebral aneurysms [3,1012]. Neurosurgeons choose more active treatments if patients with ruptured aneurysms are in good condition [13]. Moreover, conservative treatment should be considered for elderly patients in poor condition [14,15], because the elderly, unlike young people, are more likely to develop poor health, malnutrition, and complications before and after surgery [16]. In the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms, surgical treatment occurs less often because of poor prognosis [8], and coil embolization treatment is more widely used because of the rapid development of intravascular treatment technology (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Changes in the use of clip and coil embolization treatment for cases of unruptured cerebral aneurysm.

Intravascular treatment is preferred in elderly patients with weak immunity and physically poor conditions who are less able to withstand invasive and somewhat aggressive procedures [17]. According to a recent meta-analysis, intravascular treatment performed in elderly people, especially patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, is effective but results in high mortality and sequelae [18]. However, some consider surgical treatment to be safer and more effective due to the recent development of intraoperative monitoring systems and postoperative intensive care [5,6]. In our study, although clipping resulted in 3 times more complications than coil embolization, there was no significant difference in the final GOS identified at the time of discharge after surgery. Therefore, both clipping and coil embolization are safe and effective treatments for unruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients aged 65 years or older, and positive results can be derived through clipping (Fig. 2, Table 2).

Fig. 2.

A multiple-comparison graph showing patients treated by coil embolization. Those with pre-operative Glasgow outcome scores (GOS) of 4 or 5 showed no change in postoperative GOS (estimated marginal mean [emmean], 4.6), but some patients treated by coil embolization with a pre-operative GOS lower than 4 still had a low postoperative GOS (emmean, 3.7). However, patients treated by clipping with a pre-operative GOS of 4 or 5 had no change in the GOS (emmean, 4.6), and those with a pre-operative GOS lower than 4 had increases in their postoperative GOS (emmean, 4.7).

TRT: preOP.GOS, treatment: preoperation GOS.

In addition, for both clipping and coil embolization procedures, cerebral aneurysms recurred in the same locations. Based on our data, the recurrence of cerebral aneurysms occurred more than 4 times more often with coil embolization than with clipping. Therefore, although coil embolization is considered relatively safe, clipping is more effective in terms of preventing recurrence.

Age plays an important role in patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms [19]. In older patients, the risk of developing an aneurysm is high [20], and the probability of rupturing a cerebral aneurysm is also higher [3,4]. Neurosurgeons determine the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms according to the patient’s age. For example, patients aged <50 years are less likely to develop post-surgical complications, such as cerebral hemorrhage [21,22]. On the other hand, surgical clipping has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis in patients aged 65 years or older [16]. However, according to our results, this does not apply to all elderly patients, who can have a good prognosis after a craniotomy, reducing the perception that surgical treatment should be excluded because of an advanced age.

This study had several limitations. Data were collected retrospectively, and patients were not treated in a randomized manner. Therefore, a potential selection bias may have affected the outcome of patients treated with the 2 different treatments. In addition, the size of the cohorts, especially of patients treated with surgical clipping, was small. Therefore, a large, prospective randomized study should be conducted to offer a more acute perspective on the surgical decisions for older patients with cerebral aneurysms.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence of a more stable and effective treatment for elderly patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Based on our study, coil embolization and clipping were both safe and effective for elderly patients with cerebral aneurysms, and treatment should be carefully determined for patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Aggressive clipping treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be considered, with a good prognosis.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17.
2. Khosla A, Brinjikji W, Cloft H, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Age-related complications following endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:953–7.
3. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Effect of age on outcomes of treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001-2008. Stroke 2011;42:1320–4.
4. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Nasr DM, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001-2008. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1071–5.
5. Thirumala PD, Udesh R, Muralidharan A, et al. Diagnostic value of somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm clipping: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2016;89:672–80.
6. Song J, Lang L, Zhu W, et al. Application of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring during giant internal carotid artery aneurysm surgery using prolonged temporary occlusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015;157:1833–40.
7. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33.
8. Ellenbogen BK. Subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly. Gerontol Clin (Basel) 1970;12:115–20.
9. Yang H, Jiang H, Ni W, et al. Treatment strategy for unruptured intracranial aneurysm in elderly patients: coiling, clipping, or conservative? Cell Transplant 2019;28:767–74.
10. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:2368–400.
11. Yamashiro S, Nishi T, Koga K, et al. Improvement of quality of life in patients surgically treated for asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:497–500.
12. Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. Stratification of outcome for surgically treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2003;52:82–7.
13. Johansson M, Cesarini KG, Contant CF, Persson L, Enblad P. Changes in intervention and outcome in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2001;32:2845–949.
14. Schöller K, Massmann M, Markl G, et al. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in elderly patients: long-term outcome and prognostic factors in an interdisciplinary treatment approach. J Neurol 2013;260:1052–60.
15. Nieuwkamp DJ, Rinkel GJ, Silva R, Greebe P, Schokking DA, Ferro JM. Subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients > or = 75 years: clinical course, treatment and outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:933–7.
16. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10.
17. Li H, Pan R, Wang H, et al. Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:29–37.
18. Sturiale CL, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:1897–902.
19. Wermer MJ, van der Schaaf IC, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in relation to patient and aneurysm characteristics: an updated meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:1404–10.
20. Kubo Y, Koji T, Kashimura H, Otawara Y, Ogawa A, Ogasawara K. Female sex as a risk factor for the growth of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral saccular aneurysms in elderly patients. J Neurosurg 2014;121:599–604.
21. Mahaney KB, Brown RD Jr, Meissner I, et al. Age-related differences in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: 1-year outcomes. J Neurosurg 2014;121:1024–38.
22. Sedat J, Dib M, Lonjon M, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients aged 65 years and older: follow-up of 52 patients after 1 year. Stroke 2002;33:2620–5.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Changes in the use of clip and coil embolization treatment for cases of unruptured cerebral aneurysm.

Fig. 2.

A multiple-comparison graph showing patients treated by coil embolization. Those with pre-operative Glasgow outcome scores (GOS) of 4 or 5 showed no change in postoperative GOS (estimated marginal mean [emmean], 4.6), but some patients treated by coil embolization with a pre-operative GOS lower than 4 still had a low postoperative GOS (emmean, 3.7). However, patients treated by clipping with a pre-operative GOS of 4 or 5 had no change in the GOS (emmean, 4.6), and those with a pre-operative GOS lower than 4 had increases in their postoperative GOS (emmean, 4.7).

TRT: preOP.GOS, treatment: preoperation GOS.

Table 1.

Basic information of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Characteristic Clip Coil
Age (yr)
 65–69 39 55
 70–74 24 50
 75–79 3 25
 ≥80 3 9
Sex
 Female 47 99
 Male 22 40
Underlying diseases or health behaviors 
 Hypertension 47 (68.1) 97 (69.8)
 Diabetes mellitus 9 (13.0) 18 (12.9)
 Cholesterol 2 (2.9) 11 (7.9)
 Alcohol use 8 (11.6) 12 (8.6)
 Smoking 5 (7.2) 9 (6.5)
Aneurysm location
 Anterior circulation 58 (84.1) 88 (63.3)
 Posterior circulation 11 (15.9) 51 (36.7)
Aneurysm size (mm)
 3–9 55 116
 Over 9 14 23
Total (n=208) 69 (33.2) 139 (66.8)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2.

Complications after treatment with clipping and coil embolization

Clip Coil
Without complication 53 131
Complication 15 5
 Postoperative acute hemorrhage (ICH, SAH, IVH) 7 (9.9) 2 (1.4)
 Chronic SDH 2 (2.8)
 Infarction 6 (8.5)a) 2 (1.4)b)
 Puncture site infection 1 (0.7)

Values are presented as number (%).

ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; SDH, subdural hemorrhage.

a)3 recovered, b)1 recovered.